
Advertising Law
Labelling advertising: what the law requires
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.
Advertising Law
Cheap to run, effective at generating entries, and subject to gambling law, consumer law, data protection and platform rules simultaneously.

Prize promotions attract entries cheaply and sit at the intersection of four separate regulatory regimes.
Broadly, a promotion where entry requires payment and the outcome depends on chance may constitute a lottery requiring a licence.
The usual routes to avoid that: make entry free, or make the outcome depend on skill rather than chance. The definitions vary considerably by jurisdiction and the detail matters.
A free entry route must be genuinely free and genuinely equivalent, not hidden or disadvantaged.
Complete terms must be available before entry and must cover:
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Who may enter | age, residence, exclusions |
| The entry period | opening and closing, with times and time zone |
| How to enter | including any free route |
| The prize | described precisely, with its value |
| How the winner is selected | and when |
| How the winner is notified | and the deadline to respond |
| What happens if unclaimed | redraw or forfeit |
| Whether the prize is transferable or exchangeable | usually not |
| Who the promoter is | full legal identity |
Incomplete terms are the most common problem and the easiest to fix.
Entry data may be processed to run the promotion. Using it for marketing afterwards requires separate consent.
Making marketing consent a condition of entry is unlikely to produce valid consent, because consent conditioned on a benefit is generally not freely given.
The workable structure: entry requires the data needed to run the draw; an unticked, clearly separate box offers marketing consent; and entry is possible without it.
State the retention period for entry data and delete it afterwards.
Social platforms impose their own conditions, frequently stricter than the law. Common requirements: acknowledging that the platform is not involved, releasing the platform from liability, and prohibitions on requiring people to share content or tag others.
Breaching platform rules can result in the promotion being removed and, for repeated breaches, the account.
Notify within the stated period, using the stated method. Publish the winner where the terms said you would, with their consent to publication.
Keep records of the selection process. Disputes about fairness are answered with documentation and not with assertion.
The prize value may have tax consequences for the winner in some jurisdictions and for the promoter in others. State the value accurately in the terms; overstating it is a misleading claim.
Prize draws generate large numbers of entries and very poor data. Entrants want the prize, not the relationship. A list built from a prize draw typically shows low engagement and high complaint rates, which damages deliverability for the rest of your list.
Generally not. Consent conditioned on entry is unlikely to be freely given, which makes it invalid.
Yes, and they are stricter than the law in several respects. Breaching them can remove the promotion and the account.
More from Advertising Law

Advertising Law
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.

Advertising Law
The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.

Advertising Law
A claim does not have to be false to be misleading. It only has to create an impression that does not correspond to reality.