
Advertising Law
Labelling advertising: what the law requires
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.
Advertising Law
The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.

Influencer marketing has produced a consistent body of enforcement in several jurisdictions, and the rules that emerged are straightforward.
Any benefit received in exchange for coverage: payment, free products, discounts, travel, event access, commission, or an ongoing relationship.
The threshold is low. Receiving a product to keep is generally sufficient, whether or not payment was made and whether or not the creator was asked to post.
At the start of the content, visible without any action by the viewer.
| Placement | Assessment |
|---|---|
| First line of the caption, before the fold | acceptable |
| Overlaid on the image or video from the first second | acceptable |
| Platform's own disclosure tool | helpful, usually not sufficient alone |
| End of the caption | insufficient |
| Inside a block of hashtags | insufficient |
| Mentioned verbally at the end of a video | insufficient |
| In the profile biography only | insufficient |
The platform's built-in disclosure label is useful and has repeatedly been held not to be sufficient on its own, partly because its visibility varies by device and context.
The plain word for advertising, in the language of the audience. English abbreviations used with a non-English-speaking audience have been held insufficient repeatedly.
Video requires disclosure that is visible throughout, or at minimum at the start and at regular intervals, because viewers join at different points.
Live content is the hardest case. Verbal disclosure at the start, repeated periodically, plus a persistent visual element where the platform permits it.
Enforcement has proceeded against brands as well as creators. A brand that commissioned undisclosed advertising is generally liable, and pointing at the creator is not a defence.
What to put in every contract: the exact disclosure wording, its position, a requirement to use it, the right to require correction, and an indemnity.
Then check. A contractual clause that nobody verifies is a document rather than a control.
Commission-bearing links are advertising and require the same disclosure. This is the most commonly breached case, because creators frequently regard it as different.
It is not different, and platforms and regulators have both been active on it.
Advertising to children through creators attracts additional restrictions in most jurisdictions, covering both the disclosure and the content. Where a creator's audience is substantially under-age, take specific advice before proceeding.
Yes. Any benefit received in return for coverage triggers the disclosure obligation in most jurisdictions.
Generally no, provided there is no commercial relationship and no benefit received.
More from Advertising Law

Advertising Law
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.

Advertising Law
A claim does not have to be false to be misleading. It only has to create an impression that does not correspond to reality.

Advertising Law
Naming a competitor is permitted and tightly conditioned. Every condition must be met; failing one makes the whole comparison unlawful.