
Advertising Law
Influencer advertising: the legal basics
The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.
Advertising Law
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.

The rule underlying advertising disclosure across European law is a single principle: a commercial communication must be recognisable as such. Concealing the commercial purpose is prohibited.
Everything else, the specific wording, the placement, the sector rules, follows from applying that principle.
Not always. Obvious advertising in an obvious advertising position needs no label, because nobody could mistake it.
A label is required where the format could be mistaken for editorial, personal opinion or independent information.
| Situation | Label required |
|---|---|
| A display banner in an ad slot | no |
| An article that reads as editorial | yes |
| A social post by a person, paid for | yes |
| A product placement in video | yes |
| Your own shop's product page | no |
| A blog post promoting a paying partner | yes |
| A review that was paid for | yes |
The commercial character must be apparent at first contact, not after reading.
That means the label goes above or immediately with the content, visible without scrolling, in a size comparable to the surrounding text. A disclosure at the end, in the third paragraph, or behind a "more" link has been held insufficient repeatedly.
Courts and regulators across several jurisdictions have consistently held that the plain word for advertising is sufficient and that softer alternatives are not.
Held sufficient: the plain word for advertising or advertisement, in the audience's language.
Repeatedly held insufficient: sponsored, in cooperation with, supported by, industry abbreviations, and any English term used with a non-English-speaking audience.
The obligation applies to material you publish yourself. A blog post on your own site promoting a partner who paid for it requires disclosure, even though the site is obviously yours.
The reasoning is that the reader can see the site is yours and cannot see that the content was paid for by a third party.
Generally both the advertiser and the publisher. An advertiser cannot escape liability by pointing to an influencer's failure to disclose, and several enforcement actions have proceeded against the brand rather than the individual.
Practical consequence: put the disclosure obligation in the contract, specify the exact wording and position, and check compliance rather than assuming it.
Where there is doubt, label it. The cost of an unnecessary label is negligible. The cost of a missing one is an enforcement action, an injunction and the associated costs, and increasingly a public story about the concealment.
The plain word for advertising in the language of the audience. Foreign-language and industry terms have repeatedly been held insufficient.
Yes, where content looks editorial but is commercial. Obvious advertising in an obvious advertising slot needs no label.
More from Advertising Law

Advertising Law
The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.

Advertising Law
A claim does not have to be false to be misleading. It only has to create an impression that does not correspond to reality.

Advertising Law
Naming a competitor is permitted and tightly conditioned. Every condition must be met; failing one makes the whole comparison unlawful.