werbero.comThe magazine for advertising that works

Advertising Law

Comparative advertising: where the limits are

Naming a competitor is permitted and tightly conditioned. Every condition must be met; failing one makes the whole comparison unlawful.

Jun 1, 2025 2 min read 407 words
Comparative advertising: where the limits are

Key points

  • Comparative advertising is lawful only if every statutory condition is satisfied.
  • Compare like with like, on verifiable and material features.
  • Disparagement of the competitor invalidates an otherwise correct comparison.

Comparative advertising, meaning advertising that identifies a competitor or their products, is permitted in European law subject to a list of cumulative conditions.

Cumulative means all of them. Satisfying six of seven makes the advertising unlawful.

The conditions

The comparison must not be misleading. It must compare goods or services meeting the same needs or intended for the same purpose. It must compare objectively one or more material, relevant, verifiable and representative features, which may include price. It must not discredit or denigrate the competitor. It must not take unfair advantage of the competitor's reputation or trade mark. It must not present goods as imitations of a protected brand. And it must not create confusion between the advertiser and the competitor.

A comparison that is accurate, verifiable and fair in every respect except that it mocks the competitor is unlawful. The tone is a condition, not a stylistic matter.

Comparing like with like

The most common failure. The products compared must meet the same needs.

Comparing your premium service against a competitor's entry-level product, or your annual price against their monthly, or a bundled offer against an unbundled one, fails the condition even if every number is correct.

Verifiability

The features compared must be verifiable, which means the recipient must be able to check them, or the advertiser must be able to substantiate them on request.

That excludes subjective claims. "Better designed" is not verifiable; "18 per cent lighter, measured to standard X" is.

Prices

Price comparison is expressly permitted and requires care.

RequirementDetail
Current pricesat the time of publication, and kept current
Same specificationgenuinely equivalent products
Same conditionsquantity, delivery, contract term
Stated basiswhen checked, from where, what included
Substantiation retainedevidence of the competitor price

A price comparison published in March using February's competitor prices is misleading once those prices change, and the obligation to keep it current sits with the advertiser.

Denigration

Accurate criticism of a competitor's product is permitted; ridicule, insinuation and attacks on the competitor as a business are not.

The line is between comparing the products and attacking the competitor. Humour at a competitor's expense is where advertisers most often cross it.

Trade marks

Using a competitor's trade mark to identify them in a lawful comparison is permitted. Using it in a way that trades on its reputation or suggests a connection is not.

Practical advice

Comparative advertising invites a response. Assume the competitor will examine every element and take advice before publication, not after the letter arrives.

Frequently asked questions

May you name a competitor?

Yes, where the comparison meets all the conditions. Naming is not itself the problem; failing a condition is.

Can you compare prices?

Yes, if the products are genuinely comparable, the prices are current, and the basis of comparison is stated.

More from Advertising Law

Keep reading

All articles
Labelling advertising: what the law requires

Advertising Law

Labelling advertising: what the law requires

The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.

2 min readJun 7, 2025
Influencer advertising: the legal basics

Advertising Law

Influencer advertising: the legal basics

The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.

2 min readJun 5, 2025
Avoiding misleading advertising

Advertising Law

Avoiding misleading advertising

A claim does not have to be false to be misleading. It only has to create an impression that does not correspond to reality.

2 min readJun 3, 2025