
Advertising Law
Labelling advertising: what the law requires
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.
Advertising Law
Two separate permissions are needed for a photograph of a person: from whoever owns the picture and from whoever is in it. Missing either is expensive.

Using a photograph in advertising requires clearing two distinct sets of rights, and businesses routinely clear one and forget the other.
Copyright belongs to the photographer or their employer. It governs whether you may reproduce the image at all.
The right to one's own image belongs to the person depicted. In most European jurisdictions, using a recognisable person's likeness for commercial purposes requires their consent.
A licence from a photographer resolves the first and not the second.
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| The specific use | advertising, not just publication |
| The media | print, online, social, outdoor, video |
| The duration | with an end date or stated as unlimited |
| The territory | where it will appear |
| Modification | cropping, retouching, montage |
| Transfer | whether it may be used by group companies |
Consent for a website photograph does not extend to an outdoor campaign. Consent given in 2019 for unspecified use is weak evidence in 2026.
Employee photographs require consent, and that consent must be genuinely voluntary. In an employment context there is an argument that consent is not freely given, which is why written, specific consent with a clear right to refuse matters.
Consider what happens when the employee leaves. Most jurisdictions permit withdrawal of consent for future use where there is good reason, and continuing to use a former employee's image in current advertising is a common dispute.
Stock licences vary and the distinction that matters is between editorial and commercial use. Editorial-licensed images may not be used in advertising.
Check the model release status. Reputable libraries state whether a release exists and what it covers. Images without releases may not be used to advertise a product or service.
Photographs may capture protected works: architecture, sculpture, artwork, and third-party trade marks and product designs.
Rules on photographing works in public spaces vary considerably by jurisdiction. Interiors are generally more restricted than exteriors. Recognisable third-party products in an advertisement raise separate trade mark questions.
A photograph of your premises with identifiable customers in it may not be used in advertising without their consent.
Practical approach: photograph when the premises are empty or with staff who have consented, or obtain written consent from anyone identifiable.
For every image used in advertising: the source, the licence and its terms, the release status, and the consent documents for any identifiable person, with dates.
That file is what answers a claim quickly. Without it, the practical outcome of most claims is that you stop using the image and pay.
No. It covers the photographer's rights. Model releases cover the depicted person, and coverage for advertising use must be verified.
Not for advertising without the consent of identifiable individuals.
More from Advertising Law

Advertising Law
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.

Advertising Law
The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.

Advertising Law
A claim does not have to be false to be misleading. It only has to create an impression that does not correspond to reality.