
Advertising Law
Labelling advertising: what the law requires
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.
Advertising Law
A short deadline, a demand for a signed undertaking and a bill. The worst responses are ignoring it and signing it immediately.

A formal warning letter typically arrives with a short deadline, a demand to sign an undertaking with a contractual penalty, and an invoice for the sender's costs.
Ignoring it. The next step is an application for an injunction, frequently granted without a hearing in some jurisdictions, with substantially higher costs.
Signing the enclosed undertaking. It is drafted by the other side, usually more broadly than the alleged breach, and it binds you permanently with a penalty for any future breach. A single careless recurrence years later then triggers a payment.
| Response | When |
|---|---|
| Modified undertaking, narrower wording | claim substantially justified |
| Undertaking without acknowledging liability | pragmatic settlement |
| Rejection with reasons | claim unfounded |
| Partial undertaking | some points justified, others not |
| Protective filing with the court | where an injunction is likely |
The modified undertaking is the usual outcome where the claim has merit. It stops the conduct without accepting the sender's broader wording or their cost claim in full.
The sender typically claims their legal costs. Whether those are payable, and at what level, depends on whether the claim was justified and whether the amount is reasonable.
Costs claims are frequently negotiable and frequently inflated. This is a routine part of the response rather than a fixed sum.
Some jurisdictions have seen organised claiming, where warnings are issued at volume primarily to generate cost recoveries. Legislation in several countries now restricts this.
Indicators: a claimant with no genuine competitive relationship, a pattern of identical letters, a disproportionate cost claim, and a claim over a technical breach with no market effect.
Where those indicators are present, the position is considerably stronger and specialist advice is essential.
After the immediate matter, review the rest of your published material for the same problem. A claimant who succeeds on one point frequently returns for others, and a competitor who has found one breach will look for more.
No. Even an unjustified claim proceeds to an injunction if not answered, and defending that costs far more than answering.
Usually yes, while taking advice. Continuing after notice increases the exposure considerably.
More from Advertising Law

Advertising Law
The commercial purpose of a communication must be recognisable. That single principle explains almost every labelling rule in advertising.

Advertising Law
The rules are settled and routinely breached. The exposure sits with the brand as much as the creator, and the contract is where it is managed.

Advertising Law
A claim does not have to be false to be misleading. It only has to create an impression that does not correspond to reality.