werbero.comThe magazine for advertising that works

Strategy & Craft

Splitting an ad budget: the 70-20-10 rule

Seventy per cent on what works, twenty on scaling, ten on experiments. The rule is old, simple, and violated in almost every account.

May 9, 2026 2 min read 379 words
Splitting an ad budget: the 70-20-10 rule

Key points

  • Without a fixed experiment share, nothing new ever gets tested.
  • The 70 per cent must be earned by evidence, not by habit.
  • Review the split quarterly, not annually.

Advertising budgets tend to ossify. What was booked last year gets booked again, because changing it requires an argument and keeping it does not.

The three tiers

70 per cent: proven. Channels and formats where you have evidence of effect, not merely attributed conversions. This is the load-bearing part of the plan.

20 per cent: scaling. Things that worked in a test and are being expanded. New regions, new audiences, higher spend in a channel that showed promise.

10 per cent: experiments. Deliberately uncertain. New channels, new formats, new messages. Most of this fails, and that is the point.

The ten per cent is not a luxury. It is the only mechanism by which next year's seventy per cent gets discovered.

Earning the seventy

The dangerous part is tier one, because habit disguises itself as evidence. A channel that has run for four years and is never questioned is not proven, it is entrenched.

Apply a simple test once a year: for each channel in tier one, what would happen if we switched it off for six weeks? If nobody can answer, it belongs in a switch-off test, not in the protected majority.

What counts as a real experiment

Not an experimentAn experiment
A new creative in a running campaignA channel you have never used
A slightly different headlineA different audience definition
Raising the budgetA different offer structure
A new agency doing the same thingA different medium entirely

Experiments need a written hypothesis, a duration, a budget cap and a success threshold agreed before the start. Without those four they become opinions.

A worked split

On a £8,000 monthly budget for a regional service business:

  1. £5,600 proven: search advertising on service terms, local directory listings, the newsletter.
  2. £1,600 scaling: extending search to three neighbouring districts that tested well.
  3. £800 experiments: this quarter, local podcast sponsorship; next quarter, addressed mail to a bought business list.

Why quarterly review beats annual

An annual review locks a mistake in for twelve months. Quarterly review lets a failed experiment die in three months and a successful one move up a tier while it is still growing.

Set four fixed dates in the calendar. The review takes 90 minutes and consists of three questions per channel: what did it cost, what did it produce, and what would happen without it.

Frequently asked questions

What if nothing is proven yet?

Then start at 40-30-30 and shift towards 70-20-10 as evidence accumulates over two or three quarters.

Is ten per cent enough for experiments?

On a £10,000 monthly budget, £1,000 tests one new channel properly. On £2,000 it is too little; test one thing per quarter instead.

More from Strategy & Craft

Keep reading

All articles
The brief agencies actually need

Strategy & Craft

The brief agencies actually need

A bad brief produces bad work at full price, and the client pays twice. Eight questions, two pages, three hours of your time.

2 min readMay 5, 2026
Positioning before the first ad runs

Strategy & Craft

Positioning before the first ad runs

Advertising amplifies whatever you already are. If that is indistinguishable from four competitors, the budget amplifies the confusion.

2 min readMay 3, 2026