
PR & Communications
Press releases that actually get printed
An editor decides in eight seconds. What decides it is whether there is a story, and most releases do not contain one.
PR & Communications
The response is not written for the reviewer. It is written for the hundred people who will read it while deciding whether to use you.

A negative review is read by people deciding whether to use you. What they are assessing is not the complaint but your response to it.
Not the reviewer, who is unlikely to change their view. The audience is everyone reading the profile afterwards, and there are many more of them.
That changes what a good response looks like. It must be readable in isolation, factual, and demonstrate how you handle a problem.
Length: three to five sentences. Longer responses read as defensive.
| Avoid | Why |
|---|---|
| We have no record of this customer | reads as calling them a liar |
| Our policy states | nobody cares about your policy |
| As explained at the time | argument |
| We are sorry you feel that way | the least sincere phrase available |
| A legal warning | catastrophic |
| A copied template across all reviews | visible and worse than nothing |
The fourth is worth avoiding absolutely. It is widely recognised as an evasion and it makes the response worse than no response.
In medical, legal, financial and care contexts you frequently cannot confirm that the person was a client, let alone discuss the case.
The workable response acknowledges the feedback, describes the general process, and offers a direct contact. It never confirms or denies the relationship.
Within two to three working days. Fast enough to show attention, slow enough to have established the facts internally.
Responding within an hour while annoyed produces the responses that become screenshots.
The most effective answer to negative reviews is volume of genuine positive ones, which dilutes any individual complaint.
Ask at the point of maximum satisfaction: on completion, at handover, when the problem is solved. A specific request from a named person converts far better than an automated message.
Never incentivise reviews with anything of value. It breaches platform rules in most cases and consumer protection law in many.
Genuinely fabricated reviews can be reported. Platforms remove some and not others, and the process is slow.
The response in the meantime is the same as for any negative review: a calm, factual public reply. Readers are considerably better at recognising fabricated reviews than most businesses assume, particularly when the response is measured.
To every negative one, yes. To positive ones, selectively and briefly.
Only if it breaches the platform's rules: no genuine transaction, abusive content, or clearly fabricated. Unfavourable is not grounds.
More from PR & Communications

PR & Communications
An editor decides in eight seconds. What decides it is whether there is a story, and most releases do not contain one.

PR & Communications
Bought distribution lists produce nothing. Thirty names you researched yourself produce coverage, and the research takes an afternoon.

PR & Communications
The pitch is one paragraph and it is about their readers, not your company. Everything else in the relationship follows from getting that right once.